CAR PARK
COATINGS
Request a Quotation
Home / Technical / Epoxy, polyurethane or PMMA?

TECHNICAL RESOURCE

Epoxy, polyurethane or PMMA?

Compare the complete system, not the resin label.

Key point

Epoxy is often considered for suitable stable substrates; polyurethane offers flexible system options; PMMA can support restricted curing windows. The complete specification matters more than the chemistry label.

CarParkCoatings.com · Updated · Technical planning guidance

Epoxy

Often considered for durable finishes on stable suitable substrates. Rigid systems need careful assessment where movement or waterproofing is part of the brief.

Polyurethane

Available in flexible and crack-bridging deck systems. Exposure, layer build-up and wearing surface determine the suitability of a particular specification.

PMMA

Fast-curing options can help with short closures. Confirm temperature limits, ventilation, odour controls and the complete system’s technical requirements.

Specification evidence

Request current technical data for the proposed complete system. Confirm the relevant preparation method, moisture limits, movement capability, layer build-up, surface texture, application conditions and return-to-service requirements before installation.

Published by CarParkCoatings.com. Updated 2 October 2026. General planning guidance. Performance, layer thicknesses, curing times and testing requirements must be established for the selected system. This guide does not endorse a named manufacturer or replace a project-specific specification.

Services covered in this guide

Related technical guides

Relevant project case studies

READY TO DISCUSS YOUR PROJECT?

Get a Quotation for Your Car Park Coating Project

Expert advice and a considered supply-and-install proposal.

Request a Quotation